ad 3

Saturday 24 October 2015

My presentations sem-1

Paper No-1 Renaissance Literature
Topic= Ben Jonson`s chief plays

To evaluate my presentation, click here



Ben jonson`s chief plays from solankipintu

To evaluate my presentation, click here



Paper No-2 Neo-classical Literature
Topic= Psychological Growth of Gulliver

To evaluate my presentation, click here



psychological growth of Gulliver from solankipintu

To evaluate my presentation, click here


Paper No-3 Literary theory and critisicm
Topic= Nature and Function of criticism

To evaluate my presentation, click here



Nature and function of criticism from solankipintu

To evaluate my presentation, click here



Paper No-4 Indian Writing in English
Topic= voice of an Indian woman in the poems of sarojini naidu

To evaluate my presentation, click here



kanthapura as a sthala-purana

              
                              

Paper Name :Indian writing in English

Assignment Topic :”kanthapura as a sthala-purana”

Sem : 1

Name: Solanki Pintu V

Roll No : 35

Enrollment No: PG15101037



Submitted to :

       M.K. BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY
           Department Of English


Indian writing in English,

Kanthapura as sthala-puran

Ø About author : Raja Rao

                      


                  The effect of myth in the novel of Raja Rao’s  kanthapura raja rao is great son of mother india and his greatness has received  national and international recognition. comes of very old and learned south Indian Brahmin family. He was born in 1909 in the village of hassana in mysore. he lived in france from 1908 to1939,return to india on the out break of world war-2 in 1940.it was in france thousand of miles away from India, that was first novel kanthapura  (1938) was written he was awarded the padma bhushn by government of India in 1969.

              Rao’s second novel ,The Serpent and the Rope(1960), considered his masterpiece, is a philosophical and somewhat abstract account of a young intellectual Brahman and his wife seeking spiritual truth in India, France, and England; it plays on the dialogue between Orient and Occident. His other novels are the allegoric The Cat and Shakespeare: A Tale of India(1965);Comrade Kirillov (1976), an examination of communism; and The Chessmaster  and His Moves(1988), which is peopled by characters from various cultures seeking their identities.

Ø Introduction of kanthapura novel :



                                           Raja Rao’s novel Kanthapura (1938) is the first major Indian novel in English. It is a imaginary but realistic account of how a great majority of people in India lived their lives under the British rule and how they responded to the ideas and ideals of Indian nationalism. Kanthapura depicts the story of an Indian village during the British Raj, especially how Gandhi’s struggle for freedom came to a typical village, Kanthapura which is an imaginary village like Hardy’s Wessex. The novel is narrated in form of a sthal purana by an old lady in the village, Achakka.  Author follows the traditional Indian narrative technique here.

                   'Kanthapura' portrays the participation of a small village of South India in the national struggle called for by Mahatma Gandhi. Imbued with nationalism, the villagers sacrifice all their material possessions in a triumph of the spirit, showing how in the Gandhian movement people shed their narrow prejudices and united in the common cause of the non-violent civil resistance to the British Raj.





Ø KANTHAPURA AS STHALA-PURAN:

        Kanthapura a regional novel expands into a sthala-purana and microcosm of India. What is interesting is the world of kanthapura that the novelist creates with all its natural setting the novelist glues the reader right from the beginning.

     “There is no village in India, however mean, that has not a rich sthala- puran, or legendary history, of its own. some God or godlike hero has passed by the village Rama might have rested here under the papal tree, Sita might have dried her clothes, after her bath, o this yellow stone, or the Mahatma himself, on one of his  many pilgrimages through the country, might have slept in this hut, the low one, by the village gate. In this way the past mingles with the present, and gods mingle with men to make the repertory of our grandmother always bright. One such story from the contemporary annals of my village I have tried to tell”. (kanthapura 5)

               The novel rather  than being traditional novel with a neat linear structure and compact plot. KANTHAPURA follows the tradition of Indian sthala- Purana or legendary history. As Raja Rao explains in KANTHAPURA by  the imagery of village and villagers. .Kanthapura  is microcosm of the macrocosm, for what happens in kanthapura was happening all over the country during those stirring days of the Gandhian freedom struggle. as raja rao tells us in the very first sentence of his well known preface to the novel, every village in India has a rich sthala purana or legendary history. It has a legend concerning the local goddess kenchamma who protects the villager from harm and presides over their destiny. The novelist style or narration makes it a Gandhi  purana or a Gandhi epic.

                                   In kanthapura raja rao made an effective use of the mythical technique used with such success by English writers like T.S Eliot and Joyce. The use of mythical technique means that the past is juxtaposed with the present an in his way the past may serve as criticism of the present. or it may be used heighten and glorify the present. in his waste land T.S.Eliot has used the mythical technique to criticize the present and in kanthapura raja rao has used this very technique to glorify the present and impart to the novel the dignity and status of an epic or purana. it is in this way that the Gandhian movement, ”kanthapura is again another and a larger attempt at creating a sthala purana.

           As raja rao tells us in the very first sentence of his well known preface to the novel, every village in India has a rich sthala purana or legendary history. It has a legend concerning the local goddess kenchamma who protects the villager from harm and presides over their destiny. The novelist style or narration  makes it a gandhi purana or a Gandhi epic.

                  Rao depicts the regular involvement of the villagers in Sankara-Jayanthi, Kartik Purnima, Ganesh-Jayanthi, Dasara, and the Satyanarayana Puja with the intention of conveying a sense of the natural unity and cohesion of village society. Old Ramakrishnayya reads out the Sankara-Vijaya day after day and the villagers discuss Vedanta with him every afternoon. Religion, imparted through discourses and pujas (prayers), keeps alive in the natives a sense of the presence of God. Participation in a festival brings about the solidarity among them. The local deity Kenchamma protects the villagers "through famine and disease, death and despair". If the rains fail, you fall at her feet. Equally sacred is the river Himavathy which flows near Kanthapura.

                   The novel “Kanthapura” takes us to the world of history of Hindu. We also experienced the Hindu epics and also come across the Hindu thoughts. The novel has also developed its mythic and symbolic framework. We find some elements whish shows the message of Nationalism that were ancient history, religion, characters from the epics, natural landscape and simple life of the village community of Kanthapura. Hari-Kathas was practiced by the villagers. As it is a traditional form of storytelling. Hari-Kathas are the story of God. Jayramchar  was Hari-Katha man who narrated Hari-Katha based on Gandhi and his ideals. Afterwards he was arrested because of the political propaganda installed in the story.

             Gandhi’s character was portrayed as a hero’s like Ram, Krishna, Shiva in the novel “Kanthapura”. The novel defines Gandhi as a divine rebirth of Shiva. Kanthapura emerges to be a laboratory of the Gandhian thought and theory. The novel is a veritable grammar of the Gandhian myth. In Kanthapura, religion, an integral part of culture has been used for a secular and political purpose such as attaining Independence. Here religion has got a very significant role to play in defining the identity of people and also of the nation.

                  The Indian freedom movement of the 1920s  into a reenactment of the Ravana-Sita and Rama myth and also the myth of Krishna. Raja Rao’s use of myth enables him to contain Western exploitation as a moment in illusory time where everything becomes a kind of MAYA in which ‘Hindu metaphysics has effectively phagocytosed Western invasion, Western history. This is not only an exaggeration belied by the text but also a total misunderstanding of Rao’s use of myth in the novel. He makes conscious use of myths and legends and situates the novel in historical time, not in illusory time and space. It is in this sense Rao uses myths and mythical method because it provides a paradigm Gandhi comes as an AVATAR to destroy ‘ADHARMA or UNRIGHTEOUSNESS’ by killing the serpent of the foreign rule. In the Gandhian fiction “Kanthapura” still enjoys the central position it truly represents Gandhi and also the other side of the reality of the Gandhian myth.

Ø To sum up:

                       Thus, Kanthapura is a great regional novel , as well as an interesting sthala purana. The novelist rises from the particular to the general by the use of myth and legend gives to the freedom struggle of the kanthapurians an all India character. The weaving of ancient myths into the structure of the novel, gives it the quality of timelessness which all great works of art have. By mythic sing the heroic- struggle and self-sacrifice of the people of the south Indian village, he has created a new sthala-purana,a new local leged. The novel illustrates how new legends or sthala-purana, a new local legend. The novel illustrates how new legends or sthala-puranas are made , how the ordinary and the commonplace acquires larger than life dimensions in the imagination of poets and bards,or gossipy narrators like Achakka.


                                      




mimetic criticism, pragmatic criticism, expressive criticism, objective criticism



Paper Name : literary theory and criticism

Assignment Topic: mimetic criticism, pragmatic criticism, expressive criticism, objective criticism

Sem : 1

Name: Solanki Pintu V

Roll No : 35

Enrollment No: PG15101037




Submitted to :
       M.K. BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY
           Department Of English  



  v Mimetic Theory of Literary Criticism

The word mimetic
            The word "mimetic" comes from the Greek word "mimesis," the act of imitation. The mimetic theory of literary criticism places main importance on how well a literary work imitates life. In practice, mimetic critical theory often asks how well the literary work conveys universal truths and teaches the reader positive moral values and modes of personal conduct. While few would argue with positive moral values, the theory can be misused, such as moderating violence against those in difference.

Mimetic criticism

     The first theoretical coordinate is the mimetic concern. How does the poem relate to a model of external reality? Terms that fit within this approach are imitation, representation, mimesis, and mirror. Pay attention to metaphors -- the term "mirror" is the subject of Meyer Abrams' The Mirror and the Lamp. See also Hamlet's speech about art ---art "holds the mirror up to nature."

     Painting is another common mimetic term. Realism is also a mimetic theory, but it sometimes insists that art conveys universal truths, as opposed to merely temporal and particular truth. Dreiser and Hemingway may or may not render their own times and circumstances accurately, but Freud's reading of Oedipus Rex (and Ernest Jones' reading of Hamlet) claims insight into something universal about the human psyche.

     Samuel Johnson makes the same sort of claim when he argues that Shakespeare portrays universal character traits and moral values. Aristotle's take on mimetic is sophisticated-he argues that the universal can be found in the concrete. Sidney values art as an accurate representation of moral ideals and excellence. Plato, by contrast, says that poetry fails on mimetic terms-it has no access to the world of forms.

  v PragmaticTheory of Literary Criticism 

  Ø The word Pragmatic: 

       This second coordinate deals with the relationship between text and audience. The concern for the moral effects of art is often drawn from mimetic theory. Plato invokes the flawed mimetic capacity of poetry as the source of its moral contagiousness. "Psychological" critics like Wordsworth and Aristotle are pragmatists; they lay great stress on art's supposed therapeutic value.

  Ø The pragmatic criticism:

      The theories of this mode highlight the reader’s relation to the work. Towards the end of 19th century, pragmatism became the furthermost vital school of thought with in American philosophy. It continued the observer tradition of grounding knowledge on practice and stressing the inductive actions of experimental science.            

     Freud does the same. Another version of this psychological pragmatism is the one practiced by early aestheticians like Baumgartner and Kant, who wrote about the "aesthetic emotions."

      Pragmatic criticism is concerned, first andforemost, with the ethical impact any literary text has upon an audience. Regardless of art's other merits or failings, the primaryresponsibility or function of art is social in nature. Assessing, fulfilling, and shaping the needs, wants, and desires of an audience should be the first task of an artist.

      They theorized about the effects of poetic language on the mind, as does Krieger today. Aside from moral and psychological pragmatism, there is ideological or political pragmatism: cultural studies-oriented critics focus on gender, race, and class issues. They inquire into the extent to which works support or undermine particular ideologies. This is moral criticism with a political bent. One might ask, for example, what the effects of the portrayal of African-Americans were in "Gone with the Wind."

   v ExpressiveTheory of Literary Criticism  

  Ø The word Expressive:

     “Perhaps what one notices first about poetry is its sense of wonderment” (Wordsworth).Expressive criticism focuses on the artists emotion. It is well known among poets, for poetry is based on emotion. Expressive criticism describes poetry as an expression, as an over-flow of a poet’s feelings

  Ø Expressive criticism:

       This third coordinate has to do with the relationship between poet and work. Expressive theory would be the appropriate title here. Biographical criticism is expressive, as is romanticism and Freudian analysis. (See Ernest Jones on Hamlet's Oedipal feelings, which turn out to be none other than Shakespeare's own repressed Oedipal conflicts -- he attempts, says Jones, to deal with these conflicts by creating Hamlet.)

       Expressive theorists believe that individuality is something that must be conveyed in literary work. They believe in going above and beyond the objective theorists idea that a poet’s job as a poet is to stray away from personality. Objective theorists believe that criticism should focus on the poem and not the poet. What those critics don’t understand is that the poetics the poem.One of the big names associated with expressivecriticism is William Wordsworth. Wordsworth defines poetry as “emotion recollected in tranquility”. He says, “a poem is inner made outer”. Wordsworth was a naturalist. In any poem of his, that known fact becomes clear. He, himself, always plays a major role in his own poetry.

       Expressive writing has really developed since it wasfirst created. It is not only the main writing style of poetry, but it is now used in treatments, to help clients better understand their own emotions. The reason for this, is when something is expressive, it cannot be judged as fiercely as somewhat that is factual. Critics cannot have an influential opinion about how somebody feels.

      Other criticisms be likely to to restrain the status of the author while critiquing his or her work. Expressive criticism directs its focus onthe author. While expressive criticism is more likely to be used with poetry it is also valuable when critiquing novels and essays. Most people tend to focus on word choices and different styles, and mistakes that have been made, rather than why the author wrote the essay or novel, or even a short story. By focusing on the author, readers may better understand what they are reading.

  v   Objective Theory of Literary Criticism:

  Ø Definition of objective:

     objective criticism is constructive response based on balanced thoughts and facts rather than emotion and personal preference. The opposite of objective criticism is subjective criticism.


  Ø Objective criticism
 The fourth coordinate highlights the integrity and ontologically sound status of the work itself, without immediate reference to audience, poet, or external reality. Formalists practice this type of criticism.

            A term used to describe a kind of criticism that views the aesthetic object as self-ruling and self-contained. Because a work of art contains its purpose within itself (is, in Eliot's phrase, autotelic), analysis and assessment of it can take place only with reference to certain intrinsic standards -- form, coherence, organic unity (the interdependence of parts and whole)

                                   Objective study of literature appreciates “the work of art in isolation from all external points of reference, analyzes it as a self-sufficient entity constituted by its parts in their internal relations, and sets out to judge it solely by criteria intrinsic to its own mode of being” (Abrams, 1979). This theories assay to hinder from ‘the personal heresy’, ‘the intentional fallacy’, and ‘the affective fallacy’. Its doctrine in criticizing is ‘art for art’s sake’ (Abrams, 1979).

   The objective approach to literary work begins with a full description of it, if it is in the ground of poetry, it concerns thephysical elements or technical properties. The reader should try to elucidate the author's methods and meaning in an entirely objective way. It begins with the presentation of the physical elements of its literary work, about the length, the form, and etc. which become the basic information of it and proceeds to more complex information, in this case, the elements of content of the literary work, such as theme, setting, plot, characters,  point of view, and etc.

  v To sum up;

      Culler says that a literary work plays in different modes and has different content than its literal. A literary work is the creation and organization of signs which produces a human world charged with meaning (Culler, 1975: 189). This also signifies that readers always find the meaning of a literary work by comparing it to the real world in order to get the meaning. This perhaps sounds confusing, but it is the truth. A literary work, or in a broad sense a text, cannot be separated totally from ‘the property of our conceptual system’ about the reality. Interpreting therefore tends to be subjective. Thus, this is the importance of literature theory. Its aim is to make a convention of procedures for every reading so the result of it, the interpretation, becomes as objective as possible (Teeuw, 1983)




Characteristic of Neo-classical age



Paper Name : THE NEO-CLASSICAL LIRERATURE
    
Assignment Topic :“Characteristic of Neo-classical age”

Sem : 1

Name: Solanki Pintu v

Roll No : 35

Enrollment No: PG15101037




Submitted to :
       M.K. BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY
           Department Of English  






The Meaning

     The word neoclassicism has derived from Greek “neos” means “new” and Latin “classicus” means “relating to ancient Greek or Latin principles of the forms of art.”  The neoclassicism was a movement against the too much use of individualism and imagination in literature as well as the violation of classical rules and regulations in literature. The followers of the classical literature tried to put the classical norms back in literary forms and other arts also.

v General Characteristics of the Age:

    The Historical background:

       The period of English history from 1700 to 1798, commonly referred to as the Pseudo-classical or Neo-classical age, may conveniently be divided into two; The early half from 1700-1740, may be called the Age of Pope, for Pope was the leading poet and man of letters of the period, the later half of the century from 1740-1798 may be called the Age of Dr. Johnson, for Dr. Johnson was its leading literary figure. During this time first Queen Anne and then the three Georges ruled over England. Matthew Arnold refers to the period as, "Our admirable and indispensable 18th century", for the age saw the rise of the social Essay and the Novel, and the development of the modern prose style. As during the Restoration Era, in this age also, the French influence pre-dominated and neoclassicism be­came more rigid and stringent.

    Political and Religious Strife:

         The rise of the two political parties, the Whig and the Tory, goes back to the reign of Charles I. But in the early 18th century, the party spirit was more rampant than ever before. Everyone was either a Whig or a Tory. Both parties tried to secure the help of men of literary ability, and the authors now acquired an importance and an influence which they had never enjoyed before. Gradually, they became independent of the patronage of the rich and powerful. "It was the golden age of political pamphleteering and the writers made the most of it". The Puritans looked down upon the upper classes as immoral, and the courtiers called the puritans hypocrites.

    Religion and the Rise of Feeling:

       This renaissance of feeling is best illustrated in the case of religion. In the age of Pope Religion had been formal, utilitarian and un-spiritual. The preachers no longer tried to convince by appealing to the reason, rather they tried to move by appealing to the emotions. They no longer cared for propriety and correctness; rather they preached with impassioned tones and gestures. The sentimentalism of the age takes various forms.

    The Age of Complacency:

           If there is one word besides ‘façade’ that describes the neoclassical period, it is ‘complacency.’ This was an age where comfort was celebrated. The British felt relatively invincible politically, which led to an assumption of their moral and intellectual supremacy. It is the age of the rise of the Middle Class. It is an age of conspicuous consumption; Martha Stewart would have felt right at home. For the first time periodicals are filled with advertisements for home decorations, fashions, and furniture. Architecture enters the Baroque period. It becomes very important to wear clothing by the best designers, to have your hair done by the best hairdressers, and so on, and so forth. People whose parents were servants now had servants themselves.


    The Emergence of the Middle Class:

     Another important feature of the age is the emergence of the middle class which gradually gained in importance in politics, in life, and in society. There is an immense growth in the wealth and prosperity of the nation.



    The Spirit of the Age:

     After the succession of the House of Hanover the first half of the eighteenth century was a period of stabilization and steadily growing wealth and prosperity. The evils of the approaching Industrial Revolution had not yet been realized, and the country, still free from any suggestion of acrimonious class consciousness, underwent a period of comfortable aristocratic rule, in which local government rested on the squires, typified by Sir Roger DE Coverley. It was an age of tolerance, moderation, and common sense, which, in cultured circles at least, sought to refine manners and introduce into life the rule of sweet reasonableness. The balance of political power in spite of the fifty years superiority of the Whig oligarchy, was so even as to preclude fanatical party policies, while the established church pursued a placid middle way and all religion was free from strife over dogma and the fanaticism which it called ‘enthusiasm’ until Wesley and Whitefield began the Evangelical Revival. This middle way of control and reason, and the distrust of ‘enthusiasm’, are faithfully reflected in the literature of the period.

    The Marketplace of Literacy:

    All these changes meant profound changes for literature. The emphasis on self-reflection meant that genres like diaries, letters, and essays were more popular—and often read alone, in a separate reading room or ‘closet’ within the home. At the same time the new social fluidity meant that genres like the newspaper and periodical, the novel, the popular ballad, and the theatre would also find widespread public audiences. It is the age of the penny dreadful and the lending library.

v Literary Characteristics of the Age

      The political and social changes, which exhibit the supremacy of good sense, rationality and avoidance of enthusiasm, left an indelible influence on the literature of the Age of Pope. Summing up the characteristics of the literature of this period, Hudson remarks: "The same temper marks the literature of the age, which exhibits a similar coldness and want of feeling, and a similar tendency towards shallowness in thought and formality in expression. It is a literature of intelligence , of wit, and of fancy, not a literature of emotion, passion, or creative energy; and in it spontaneity and simplicity are sacrificed to the dominant mania of elegance and correctness.

    The predominance of prose:

          The age of Pope intensified the movement that, as we have seen, began after the Restoration. The drift away from the poetry of passion was more pronounced than ever, the ideals of ‘Wit’ and ‘common sense’ were more zealously pursued, and the lyrical note was almost unheard. In its place we find in poetry the overmastering desire for neatness and perspicuity, for edge and point in style, and for correctness in technique. These aims received expression in the devotion to the heroic couplet, the aptest medium for the purpose. In this type of poetry the supreme master is Pope; apart from him the age produced no great poet. On the other hand, the other great names of the period-Swift, Addison, Steele, Defoe- are those of prose- writers primarily, and prose- writers of a very high quality.

1 1)     Political Writing:

                      We have already noticed the rise of the two political parties, accompanied by an increased acerbity of political passion. This development gave a fresh importance to men of literary ability, for both parties competed for the assistance of their pens, bribed the author with places and pensions, and admitted them more or less deeply into their counsels. In previous ages authors had to depend on their patrons, often capricious being or upon the length of their subscription lists; they now acquired an independence and an importance that turned the heads of some of them. Hardly a writer of the time is free from the political bios. After being a Whig, Swift became a virulent Tory; Addison was a tepid Whig; Steele was Whig and Tory in turn. It was indeed the Golden Age of political pamphleteer, and the writers made the most of it.

(2)   The Clubs and Coffee-houses:

                     Politicians are necessarily gregarious, and the increased activity in politics led to a great addition to the number of political clubs and coffee-houses, which became the foci of fashionable and public life. In the first number of the Tatler Steele announces as a matter of course that the activities of his new journal will be based upon the clubs. All accounts of Gallantry, pleasure, and Entertainment shall be under the article of White’s Chocolate-House; poetry under that of wills coffee-House; Learning under the title of Grecian; foreign and Domestic News you will have from Saint James’ coffee-house. These coffee-houses became the ‘clearing-houses’ for literary business, and from them branched purely literary associations such as the famous scribblers and Kit-Cat Clubs, those haunts of the fashionable writers which figure so prominently in the writings of the period.


(3)   Periodical Writing:

      The development of the periodical will be noticed elsewhere. It is sufficient here to point out that the struggle for political mastery led both factions to issue a swarm of Examiners, and similar publications. These journals were run by a band of vigorous and facile prose- writers, who in their differing degrees of excellence represent almost a new type in our literature.


(4)   The New Publishing Houses:

    The interest in politics, and probably the decline in the drama, caused a great increase in the size of the reading public. In its turn this aroused the activities of a number of men who became the forerunners of the modern publishing houses. Such were Edmund Curll (1675-1747), Jacob Tonson (1656-1736), and John Dunton (1659-1733). These men employed numbers of needy writers, who produced the translations, adaptations, and other popular works of the time. It is unwise to judge a publisher by what authors say of him, but the universal condemnation leveled against Curll and his kind compels the belief that they were a breed of scoundrels who preyed upon author. The miserable race of hack-writers- venomously attacked by Pope in The Dunciad- who existed on the scanty bounty of such men lived largely in a thoroughfare near moor fields called Grub Street, the name of which has become synonymous with literary drudgery.

(5)   The New Morality:

   immorality of the Restoration, which had been almost entirely a court phenomenon and was largely the reaction against extreme Puritanism, soon spent itself. The natural process of time was hastened by opinion in high quarters. William 3 was a severe moralist, and Anne, his successor, was of the same character. Thus we soon see a new tone in the writing of the time and a new attitude to life and morals. Addison, in an early number of The Spectator, puts the new fashion in his own admirable way;

‘I shall Endeavor to enliven morality with wit, and to temper with morality.’’

Another development of the same spirit is seen in the revised opinion of women, who are treated with new respect and dignity. Much coarseness is still to be felt, especially in which Swift, for instance, can be quite vile; but the general upward tendency is undoubtedly there.

v Neoclassical poetry

         Neoclassical poetry is characterized as such because it reflects the ideas of the neoclassical period in history, which occurred in the 17th and 18th centuries. Some of the major themes during this period included the importance of reason, morality, and order. In both content and form, these themes were emphasized in neoclassical poetry.

       "In poetry, the tradition continued of brilliant topical satire and of didactic poetry that frequently was more tedious than brilliant. Appeal was normally sought to what was variously called Reason, Nature, or Common Sense. Polish and elegance of form were of more importance than subtlety or originality of thought." So Moody and Lovett comment on the poetry of this period.

    Major poets:

              Alexander Pope (1688-1744). Born in 1688, Pope wrote tolerable verse when he was twelve years old. He was the son of a London tradesman. His tiny and delicate physical constitution, and his faith in Roman Cathlicism greatly influenced his career as a poet. Due to his ill health he was privately educated, and could not cultivate the knowledge of the world of nature or of the world of human heart. By reason of the sweeping laws against the entrance of Catholics into public service, he was shut out from the ordinary career of Englishmen in Parliament, the Church, or the Army. So, he dedicated his whole life to literature. Other men of letters of his age had other engagements but he rose only to be a poet. W. J. Long remarks: "Swift was a clergeyman and politician, Addison was Secretary of State, other writers depended on patrons or politics or pensions for fame and a livelihood; but Pope was independent, and had no profession, but literature." Pope received very little school education, but he privately studied English books and picked up a smattering of the classics.

               He wrote one of the famous satirical Epic-poem. He was a famous Essayist, critical and also a poet. His work like ‘The Rape of the lock’, verses to the memory of an unfortunate Lady (1717) and dunciad are (1728) noteworthy. His essays are also written in verse form and are as beautiful as his poems. His first book can be considered as a longer philosophical poem. An essay on criticism is a kind of rhyming verse known as heroic couplets. It first appeared in 1711, yet written in 1709.The ‘Rope of the hock’ is a beautiful heroic narrative poem. It was first published in two cantos and later another three cantos added to the previous ones. The last canto was available only in 1717 with the addition of the moral speech of Charisa. This poem satirizes a minor actual incident pope satirizes the beauty conscious and hypocrite contemporary society of his country. Belinda the heroine is shown elegant. She is a beauty that is fragile. She loses a lock a hair which touches her deeply. His another poem Eloisa to Abelard is inspired by the 12th century’s illicit love and secret marriage. Pannell, Tickell and Philips can be considered minor poets with one or two noteworthy verses.   Pope’s Essay is regarded, in poets as true genius is but rare, True Taste as seldom is the critic’s share.


    Matthew Prior's (1664-1721) first work is a parody of Dryden's The Hind and the Panther, entitled The Town and Country Mouse (1687). It was written in collaboration with Charles Montagu. His other works are Alma, or The Progress of the Mind (1718) and Solomon on the Vanity of the World (1718). Alma is an imitation of Butler's Hudibras and Solomon is written in heroic couplet. Prior's longer poems lack in strength, power and passion. Prior's reputation rests on his shorter pieces which are The Chameleon, The Thief and the Cordelier, and a number of poems, To Chole.

    John Gay (1685-1732) is best remembered for his Fables (1727), which is colloquial, easy, octosyllabic, and The Beggar's Opera (1728), which is a famous play. It contains some pretty songs and much genuine but boisterous humour. Gay's chief poetic works are The Rural Sports (1713), written in the heroic couplet, The Shepherd's Week (1714), What d' Ye Call It (1715), a pastoral farce, and Trivia or The Art of Walking the Streets of London (1716), a witty parody of the heroic style. Gay mirrors the manners and outward show of his age.

    Edward Young (1683-1765) wrote varied kind of poetry. His Last Day (1714) and The Force of Religion (1714) are moralizings written in the heroic couplet. The Love of Fame (1725-28) shows an advance in the use of the heroic couplet. He is remembered for The Complaint or Night Thoughts on Life, Death and Immortality (1742), which is written in the blank verse. It was occasioned by the death of his wife. It is a lengthy poem of sententious reflection and shows considerable technical skill in the management of the blank verse, but it is handicapped by a stilted, theatrical phraseology. It anticipates the "Churchyard School" of poetry.

    Samuel Garth's (1661-1719) The Dispensary (1699) is a satire on the Society of Apothecaries. It is written in the couplet.

    William Somerville (1675-1742) wrote The Chase, a gloomy and sombre poem, imitating the 'Churchyard School' of poetry.

v Conclusion
                       Thus, We can say that such characteristics were there during 18th century which were reflect by play, drama, novel, poetry and other literary arts. Reflection of society and behavior of contemporary time.